Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-012-9408-z
Title: Coverage-Reliability, Epistemic Dependence, and the Problem of Rumor-Based Belief
Authors: Gelfert, A. 
Keywords: Coverage
Epistemic dependence
Rumor
Rumour
Social epistemology
Issue Date: Sep-2013
Citation: Gelfert, A. (2013-09). Coverage-Reliability, Epistemic Dependence, and the Problem of Rumor-Based Belief. Philosophia (United States) 41 (3) : 763-786. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-012-9408-z
Abstract: Rumors, for better or worse, are an important element of public discourse. The present paper focuses on rumors as an epistemic phenomenon rather than as a social or political problem. In particular, it investigates the relation between the mode of transmission and the reliability, if any, of rumors as a source of knowledge. It does so by comparing rumor with two forms of epistemic dependence that have recently received attention in the philosophical literature: our dependence on the testimony of others, and our dependence on what has been called the 'coverage-reliability' of our social environment (Goldberg 2010). According to the latter, an environment is 'coverage-reliable' if, across a wide range of beliefs and given certain conditions, it supports the following conditional: If ~p were true I would have heard about it by now. However, in information-deprived social environments with little coverage-reliability, rumors may transmit information that could not otherwise be had. This suggests that a trade-off exists between levels of trust in the coverage-reliability of official sources and (warranted) trust in rumor as a source of information. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Source Title: Philosophia (United States)
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/124447
ISSN: 00483893
DOI: 10.1007/s11406-012-9408-z
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Sep 24, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on Sep 16, 2022

Page view(s)

178
checked on Sep 22, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.