Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091666
Title: Diagnostic and prognostic utility of a DNA hypermethylated gene signature in prostate cancer
Authors: Goh, L.K.
Liem, N.
Vijayaraghavan, A.
Chen, G.
Lim, P.L.
Tay, K.-J.
Chang, M.
Low, J.S.W.
Joshi, A.
Huang, H.H.
Kalaw, E.
Tan, P.H.
Hsieh, W.-S.
Yong, W.P. 
Alumkal, J.
Sim, H.G.
Issue Date: 13-Mar-2014
Citation: Goh, L.K., Liem, N., Vijayaraghavan, A., Chen, G., Lim, P.L., Tay, K.-J., Chang, M., Low, J.S.W., Joshi, A., Huang, H.H., Kalaw, E., Tan, P.H., Hsieh, W.-S., Yong, W.P., Alumkal, J., Sim, H.G. (2014-03-13). Diagnostic and prognostic utility of a DNA hypermethylated gene signature in prostate cancer. PLoS ONE 9 (3) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091666
Abstract: We aimed to identify a prostate cancer DNA hypermethylation microarray signature (denoted as PHYMA) that differentiates prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), high from low-grade and lethal from non-lethal cancers. This is a non-randomized retrospective study in 111 local Asian men (87 prostate cancers and 24 BPH) treated from 1995 to 2009 in our institution. Archival prostate epithelia were laser-capture microdissected and genomic DNA extracted and bisulfite-converted. Samples were profiled using Illumina GoldenGate Methylation microarray, with raw data processed by GenomeStudio. A classification model was generated using support vector machine, consisting of a 55-probe DNA methylation signature of 46 genes. The model was independently validated on an internal testing dataset which yielded cancer detection sensitivity and specificity of 95.3% and 100% respectively, with overall accuracy of 96.4%. Second validation on another independent western cohort yielded 89.8% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity, with overall accuracy of 88.7%. A PHYMA score was developed for each sample based on the state of methylation in the PHYMA signature. Increasing PHYMA score was significantly associated with higher Gleason score and Gleason primary grade. Men with higher PHYMA scores have poorer survival on univariate (p = 0.0038, HR = 3.89) and multivariate analyses when controlled for (i) clinical stage (p = 0.055, HR = 2.57), and (ii) clinical stage and Gleason score (p = 0.043, HR = 2.61). We further performed bisulfite genomic sequencing on 2 relatively unknown genes to demonstrate robustness of the assay results. PHYMA is thus a signature with high sensitivity and specificity for discriminating tumors from BPH, and has a potential role in early detection and in predicting survival. © 2014 Goh et al.
Source Title: PLoS ONE
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/116976
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091666
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Oct 20, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
checked on Oct 20, 2021

Page view(s)

115
checked on Oct 14, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.