Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC.2013.6627479
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Laser-triggering of spark gap switches | |
dc.contributor.author | Larsson, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yap, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Au, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Carlsson, T.E. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-12T07:36:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-12T07:36:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Larsson, A.,Yap, D.,Au, J.,Carlsson, T.E. (2013). Laser-triggering of spark gap switches. Digest of Technical Papers-IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC.2013.6627479" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC.2013.6627479</a> | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9781467351676 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/116094 | |
dc.description.abstract | Switching time jitter is one of the important properties to consider when selecting a closing switch for a pulsedpower system, and the most time-precise triggering can be achieved by the use of lasers. For a mid-gap laser-triggered spark gap, three different physical mechanisms can be used: nonresonant multiphoton ionization, resonant-enhanced multiphoton ionization and electron tunneling. The first one is tradition all y used, wher eas the latter two are more exploratory. In this work, the traditional method is employed to study the delay time and time jitter of a laser-triggered spark gap using a Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm and 532 nm, where the laser pulse is guided via an optical fibre to the spark gap; the laser pulse energy and the applied voltage have been varied for different working gases. One draw-back of the current laser triggering technology compared to other triggering techniques is that laser systems are more complex and prone to electromagnetic interference. Another downside is that the pulse-repetition rate is poor. A discussion about the development of lasers to overcome these issues is included, together with a deliberation about the pros and cons of the two exploratory methods of laser triggering. © 2013 IEEE. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PPC.2013.6627479 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
dc.contributor.department | TEMASEK LABORATORIES | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1109/PPC.2013.6627479 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Digest of Technical Papers-IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference | |
dc.description.page | - | |
dc.description.coden | DPICD | |
dc.identifier.isiut | NOT_IN_WOS | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Jan 29, 2023
Page view(s)
140
checked on Feb 2, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.