Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0419
Title: Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia
Authors: Chan, M.E.
McAllister, D.J. 
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2014
Citation: Chan, M.E., McAllister, D.J. (2014-01-01). Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia. Academy of Management Review 39 (1) : 44-66. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0419
Abstract: We use insights into the social dynamics of state paranoia to better understand and explain the evolution and effects of perceived abusive supervision. Within our framework, abusive supervision and employee state paranoia are reciprocally related. We explain how perceived abusive supervision can influence paranoid arousal (characterized by extreme distrust, a sense of threat, anxiety, and fear of one's supervisor) and paranoid cognition (characterized by hypervigilance, rumination, and sinister attribution tendencies) and how it has attendant implications for employee behavior. We also identify an intrapersonal mechanism of cognitive bias (e.g., sinister attribution tendencies, interpretive bias), and an interpersonal process of victim precipitation whereby employee state paranoia can influence both experienced and subjective evaluations of abusive supervision. In addition, we identify personal, relational, and contextual factors that moderate the relationship between abusive supervision and employee state paranoia. Our analysis brings into focus the psychological and emergent nature of abusive supervision, as well as the mechanisms by which abusive supervision influences employee psychological well-being and behavior. © Academy of Management Review.
Source Title: Academy of Management Review
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/114877
ISSN: 03637425
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2011.0419
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

62
checked on Sep 18, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

42
checked on Jun 27, 2019

Page view(s)

117
checked on Sep 19, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.