Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820203300203
Title: Authenticity in college English textbooks - An intercultural perspective
Authors: Feng, A. 
Byram, M.
Issue Date: 2002
Citation: Feng, A.,Byram, M. (2002). Authenticity in college English textbooks - An intercultural perspective. RELC Journal 33 (2) : 58-84. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820203300203
Abstract: The use of 'authentic texts' is one of the most important criteria acknowledged by writers of textbooks for language teaching. How do textbook writers define authentic materials? How have scholars in language education challenged conventional beliefs in authenticity in recent years? Is authenticity really an illusion as some scholars claim? This paper is to focus on these issues. The following pages will first briefly review different perspectives in discussing authenticity in foreign language education. On the basis of the review, the paper suggests a perspective that takes intercultural communicative competence as a starting point addressing four fundamental issues of authenticity for textbook writing in countries where English is spoken as a foreign or second language. The four issues include intercultural representation, mediation of intention and interpretation, balance of diachrony and synchrony and image representations, and principles of contrivance. To illustrate the perspective, the prevailing definition of authentic texts by Chinese textbook writers will be examined as represented in recent literature about College English teaching and in some survey data. College English 2, one of the most widely-used College English textbook series, will be used as the focus of analysis in broad terms in accordance with the four dimensions identified.
Source Title: RELC Journal
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/114686
ISSN: 00336882
DOI: 10.1177/003368820203300203
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Nov 21, 2022

Page view(s)

175
checked on Nov 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.