Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Risk perception and impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) on work and personal lives of healthcare workers in Singapore: What can we learn?||Authors:||Koh, D.
Social and work impact
|Issue Date:||Jul-2005||Citation:||Koh, D., Meng, K.L., Sin, E.C., Soo, M.K., Qian, F., Ng, V., Ban, H.T., Kok, S.W., Wuen, M.C., Hui, K.T., Ng, W., Muttakin, Z., Emmanuel, S., Ngan, P.F., Koh, G., Chong, T.K., Tan, K.B.-C., Fones, C. (2005-07). Risk perception and impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) on work and personal lives of healthcare workers in Singapore: What can we learn?. Medical Care 43 (7) : 676-682. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc||Abstract:||Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs. Copyright © 2005 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.||Source Title:||Medical Care||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/113884||ISSN:||00257079||DOI:||10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Sep 22, 2021
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Sep 22, 2021
checked on Sep 23, 2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.