Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.009
Title: Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER)
Authors: Ho, K.-Y.
Phee, S.J.
Shabbir, A.
Low, S.C.
Huynh, V.A.
Kencana, A.P.
Yang, K.
Lomanto, D.
So, B.Y.J.
Wong, Y.Y.J. 
Chung, S.C.S.
Issue Date: Sep-2010
Citation: Ho, K.-Y., Phee, S.J., Shabbir, A., Low, S.C., Huynh, V.A., Kencana, A.P., Yang, K., Lomanto, D., So, B.Y.J., Wong, Y.Y.J., Chung, S.C.S. (2010-09). Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 72 (3) : 593-599. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.009
Abstract: Background: Performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by using standard endoscopy platforms is technically challenging because of the equipment's lack of dexterity. Objective: To explore the feasibility of using the Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER), a novel robotics-enhanced endosurgical system, to perform ESD. Design: ESD was performed on simulated gastric lesions in 5 Erlangen porcine stomach models (ex vivo) and 5 live pigs (in vivo). Performance of ESD by using the MASTER was compared with that using the insulation-tipped (IT) diathermic knife. Setting: SMART Laboratory, Advance Surgical Training Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore. Subjects: Five Erlangen porcine stomach models and 5 pigs, 5 to 7 months old, each weighing about 35 kg. Interventions: ESD. Main Outcome Measurements: Lesion resection time, grasper and hook efficacy grade, completeness of resection, and presence of procedure-related perforation. Results: In the Erlangen stomach models, 15 simulated lesions from the cardia, antrum, and body were removed en bloc (mean dimension, 37.4 × 26.5 mm) by electrocautery excision using the MASTER. The mean ESD time was 23.9 minutes (range 7-48 minutes). There was no difference in the dissection times of lesions at different locations (P = .449). In the live pigs, the MASTER took a mean of 16.2 minutes (range 3-29 minutes) to complete the ESD of 5 gastric lesions, whereas the IT diathermic knife took 18.6 minutes (range 9-34 minutes). There was no significant difference in the times taken (P = .708). All lesions were excised en bloc; the mean dimensions of lesions resected by the MASTER and the IT diathermic knife were 37.2 × 30.1 mm and 32.78 × 25.6 mm, respectively. The MASTER exhibited good grasping and cutting efficiency throughout. Surgical maneuvers were achieved with ease and precision. There was no incidence of excessive bleeding or stomach wall perforation. Limitations: Exploratory study with limited sample size. Conclusions: Performing ESD by using the MASTER is feasible. © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Source Title: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/113459
ISSN: 00165107
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.009
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
checked on Jul 27, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

53
checked on Jul 27, 2021

Page view(s)

92
checked on Jul 12, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.