Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/112116
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe human papillomavirus type 16 E2 transcription factor binds with low cooperativity to two flanking sites and represses the E6 promoter through displacement of Sp1 and TFIID
dc.contributor.authorTan, S.-H.
dc.contributor.authorLeong, L.E.-C.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, P.A.
dc.contributor.authorBernard, H.-U.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-28T02:53:22Z
dc.date.available2014-11-28T02:53:22Z
dc.date.issued1994-10
dc.identifier.citationTan, S.-H.,Leong, L.E.-C.,Walker, P.A.,Bernard, H.-U. (1994-10). The human papillomavirus type 16 E2 transcription factor binds with low cooperativity to two flanking sites and represses the E6 promoter through displacement of Sp1 and TFIID. Journal of Virology 68 (10) : 6411-6420. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn0022538X
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/112116
dc.description.abstractThe E6 promoters of all genital human papillomaviruses have a characteristic alignment of transcription factor binding sites. Activation of the basic transcription complex at the TATA box depends upon a sequence- aberrant Sp1 site. Repression of E6 promoters is achieved by two binding sites for the viral E2 protein positioned between the Sp1 site and the TATA box. We have purified the human papillomavirus type 16 E2 protein after expression in Escherichia coli and studied its binding and repression properties with oligonucleotides representing the homologous promoter sequences. A K(d) value of 3 x 10-10 M indicated binding properties expected for a native protein. We found low cooperativity in the binding of two E2 dimers to flanking sites, both when these sites were separated by 3 nucleotides, as in the natural promoter, and when they were further apart. E2 protein, bound close to the distal Sp1 site, displaced the Sp1 factor even when the aberrant sequence was replaced by a typical Sp1 core recognition site. The high affinity of E2 protein for its binding site even led to Sp1 displacement at concentrations of E2 protein nearly 2 orders of magnitude lower than those of Sp1. Functional analyses of mutated E6 promoter sequences showed repression by this distal E2 binding site in the complete absence of binding to the proximal E2 binding site. From our findings and observations published by others, we conclude that each of the E2 binding sites in the E6 promoter of genital human papillomaviruses plays a separate role by displacing the transcription factors Sp1 and TFIID.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentINSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR & CELL BIOLOGY
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Virology
dc.description.volume68
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.page6411-6420
dc.description.codenJOVIA
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

69
checked on Aug 18, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.