Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Why scholars of minority rights in Asia should recognize the limits of Western models||Authors:||Miller, M.A.||Keywords:||Citizenship
|Issue Date:||May-2011||Citation:||Miller, M.A. (2011-05). Why scholars of minority rights in Asia should recognize the limits of Western models. Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (5) : 799-813. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.537356||Abstract:||This article considers the relationship between ethnic and racial minority rights and citizenship in Asia. The most ethnically divided and populous region in the world, Asia is home to some of the most contrasting state responses to ethnic minority assertions of diversity and difference. Asia is also awash with wide-ranging claims by geographically-dispersed ethnic minorities to full and equal citizenship. In exploring the relationship between ethnic minority rights claims and citizenship in Asia, this article considers the relevance of certain core assumptions in Western-dominated citizenship theory to Asian experiences. The aim is to look beyond absolutist West-East and civic-ethnic bifurcations to consider more constructive questions about what Asian andWestern models might learn from one another in approaching minority citizenship issues. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.||Source Title:||Ethnic and Racial Studies||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110982||ISSN:||01419870||DOI:||10.1080/01419870.2010.537356|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.