Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-010-9079-5
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAchieving high research reporting quality through the use of computational ontologies
dc.contributor.authorZaveri, A.
dc.contributor.authorCofiel, L.
dc.contributor.authorShah, J.
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, S.
dc.contributor.authorChan, E.
dc.contributor.authorDameron, O.
dc.contributor.authorPietrobon, R.
dc.contributor.authorAng, B.T.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T09:03:34Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T09:03:34Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.citationZaveri, A., Cofiel, L., Shah, J., Pradhan, S., Chan, E., Dameron, O., Pietrobon, R., Ang, B.T. (2010-12). Achieving high research reporting quality through the use of computational ontologies. Neuroinformatics 8 (4) : 261-271. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-010-9079-5
dc.identifier.issn15392791
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110484
dc.description.abstractSystematic reviews and meta-analyses constitute one of the central pillars of evidence-based medicine. However, clinical trials are poorly reported which delays meta-analyses and consequently the translation of clinical research findings to clinical practice. We propose a Center of Excellence in Research Reporting in Neurosurgery (CERR-N) and the creation of a clinically significant computational ontology to encode Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) studies in neurosurgery. A 128 element strong computational ontology was derived from the Trial Bank ontology by omitting classes which were not required to perform meta-analysis. Three researchers from our team tagged five randomly selected RCT's each, published in the last 5 years (2004-2008), in the Journal of Neurosurgery (JoN), Neurosurgery Journal (NJ) and Journal of Neurotrauma (JoNT). We evaluated inter and intra observer reliability for the ontology using percent agreement and kappa coefficient. The inter-observer agreement was 76.4%, 75.97% and 74.9% and intra-observer agreement was 89.8%, 80.8% and 86.56% for JoN, NJ and JoNT respectively. The inter-observer kappa coefficient was 0.60, 0.54 and 0.53 and the intra-observer kappa coefficient was 0.79, 0.82 and 0.79 for JoN, NJ and JoNT journals respectively. The high degree of inter and intra-observer agreement confirms tagging consistency in sections of a given scientific manuscript. Standardizing reporting for neurosurgery articles can be reliably achieved through the integration of a computational ontology within the context of a CERR-N. This approach holds potential for the overall improvement in the quality of reporting of RCTs in neurosurgery, ultimately streamlining the translation of clinical research findings to improvement in patient care. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-010-9079-5
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicine
dc.subjectKappa coefficient
dc.subjectMeta-analyses
dc.subjectNeurosurgery
dc.subjectOntology
dc.subjectRCT
dc.subjectReporting
dc.subjectStandardized
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE
dc.description.doi10.1007/s12021-010-9079-5
dc.description.sourcetitleNeuroinformatics
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page261-271
dc.description.codenNEURK
dc.identifier.isiut000284194400005
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Mar 27, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Mar 27, 2020

Page view(s)

66
checked on Mar 28, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.