Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014368
Title: So different, yet so similar: Meta-analysis and policy modeling of willingness to participate in clinical trials among Brazilians and Indians
Authors: Zammar, G.
Meister, H.
Shah, J. 
Phadtare, A.
Cofiel, L.
Pietrobon, R. 
Issue Date: 2010
Citation: Zammar, G., Meister, H., Shah, J., Phadtare, A., Cofiel, L., Pietrobon, R. (2010). So different, yet so similar: Meta-analysis and policy modeling of willingness to participate in clinical trials among Brazilians and Indians. PLoS ONE 5 (12) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014368
Abstract: Background: With the global expansion of clinical trials and the expectations of the rise of the emerging economies known as BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India and China), the understanding of factors that affect the willingness to participate in clinical trials of patients from those countries assumes a central role in the future of health research. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) of willingness to participate in clinical trials among Brazilian patients and then we compared it with Indian patients (with results of another SRMA previously conducted by our group) through a system dynamics model. Results: Five studies were included in the SRMA of Brazilian patients. Our main findings are 1) the major motivation for Brazilian patients to participate in clinical trials is altruism, 2) monetary reimbursement is the least important factor motivating Brazilian patients, 3) the major barrier for Brazilian patients to not participate in clinical trials is the fear of side effects, and 4) Brazilian patients are more likely willing to participate in clinical trials than Indians. Conclusion: Our study provides important insights for investigators and sponsors for planning trials in Brazil (and India) in the future. Ignoring these results may lead to unnecessary fund/time spending. More studies are needed to validate our results and for better understanding of this poorly studied theme. © 2010 Zammar et al.
Source Title: PLoS ONE
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110451
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014368
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Apr 1, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
checked on Mar 24, 2020

Page view(s)

46
checked on Mar 28, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.