Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Selection mechanisms underlying high impact biomedical research - a qualitative analysis and causal model||Authors:||Zelko, H.
Bonilauri Ferreira, A.P.
|Issue Date:||2010||Citation:||Zelko, H., Zammar, G.R., Bonilauri Ferreira, A.P., Phadtare, A., Shah, J., Pietrobon, R. (2010). Selection mechanisms underlying high impact biomedical research - a qualitative analysis and causal model. PLoS ONE 5 (5) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010535||Abstract:||Background: Although scientific innovation has been a long-standing topic of interest for historians, philosophers and cognitive scientists, few studies in biomedical research have examined from researchers' perspectives how high impact publications are developed and why they are consistently produced by a small group of researchers. Our objective was therefore to interview a group of researchers with a track record of high impact publications to explore what mechanism they believe contribute to the generation of high impact publications. Methodology/Principal Findings: Researchers were located in universities all over the globe and interviews were conducted by phone. All interviews were transcribed using standard qualitative methods. A Grounded Theory approach was used to code each transcript, later aggregating concept and categories into overarching explanation model. The model was then translated into a System Dynamics mathematical model to represent its structure and behavior. Five emerging themes were found in our study. First, researchers used heuristics or rules of thumb that came naturally to them. Second, these heuristics were reinforced by positive feedback from their peers and mentors. Third, good communication skills allowed researchers to provide feedback to their peers, thus closing a positive feedback loop. Fourth, researchers exhibited a number of psychological attributes such as curiosity or open-mindedness that constantly motivated them, even when faced with discouraging situations. Fifth, the system is dominated by randomness and serendipity and is far from a linear and predictable environment. Some researchers, however, took advantage of this randomness by incorporating mechanisms that would allow them to benefit from random findings. The aggregation of these themes into a policy model represented the overall expected behavior of publications and their impact achieved by high impact researchers. Conclusions: The proposed selection mechanism provides insights that can be translated into research coaching programs as well as research policy models to optimize the introduction of high impact research at a broad scale among institutional and governmental agencies. © 2010 Zelko et al.||Source Title:||PLoS ONE||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110262||ISSN:||19326203||DOI:||10.1371/journal.pone.0010535|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 18, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Feb 11, 2020
checked on Feb 15, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.