Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2897-6
Title: Risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery
Authors: Wu, L.C.
Malhotra, R. 
Allen Jr., J.C.
Lie, D.
Tan, T.C.
Østbye, T. 
Keywords: Checklist
Episiotomy
Guideline
Midwife
Singapore
Issue Date: Dec-2013
Citation: Wu, L.C., Malhotra, R., Allen Jr., J.C., Lie, D., Tan, T.C., Østbye, T. (2013-12). Risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 288 (6) : 1249-1256. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2897-6
Abstract: Purpose: In Singapore, a developed Asian nation, a relatively high proportion of women undergo episiotomy. We assess risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy among women undergoing normal vaginal deliveries (NVDs) conducted by midwives and ascertain the association between episiotomy and degree of perineal tear. Methods: Participants included 77 midwives from a high-volume delivery unit in Singapore. The study had three sequential phases: (1) medical record review of women undergoing NVDs conducted by midwives over a 1-month period to document the proportion with episiotomy; (2) focus group discussions with midwives to form a checklist of reasons for episiotomy; (3) checklist-based documentation of midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy and data collection on maternal, neonatal, practice and midwife factors, and degree of perineal tear among women undergoing NVDs conducted by midwives over a 2-month period. Risk factors for episiotomy were assessed through logistic regression. Results: Primiparity, advanced maternal age, Indian ethnicity, higher birth weight and older midwife age were associated with episiotomy. The most common midwife-reported reason for episiotomy among primiparous women was primiparity (55.1 %), and among multiparous women was fetal distress (20.0 %) and poor maternal effort (20.0 %). All women with episiotomy sustained at least a second-degree perineal tear versus 27.1 % among women without episiotomy. Conclusion: Most midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy were not congruent with international practice guidelines. Women without episiotomy have lesser tears than those with episiotomy. Practice protocols and educational programs are needed to change episiotomy practice. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Source Title: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110256
ISSN: 09320067
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2897-6
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

19
checked on Jan 15, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
checked on Jan 15, 2020

Page view(s)

68
checked on Jan 18, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.