Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.321
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology in adolescents | |
dc.contributor.author | Bernstein, I.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rush, A.J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Trivedi, M.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, C.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Macleod, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Witte, B.P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jain, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mayes, T.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Emslie, G.J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-11-26T08:30:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-11-26T08:30:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bernstein, I.H., Rush, A.J., Trivedi, M.H., Hughes, C.W., Macleod, L., Witte, B.P., Jain, S., Mayes, T.L., Emslie, G.J. (2010-12). Psychometric properties of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology in adolescents. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 19 (4) : 185-194. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.321 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 10498931 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110235 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The clinician-rated (QIDS-C16) and self-report (QIDS-SR16) versions of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology have been extensively examined in adult populations. This study evaluated both versions of the QIDS and the 17-item Children's Depressive Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) in an adolescent outpatient sample.Method: Both the QIDS-C16 and QIDS-SR16 were completed for the adolescents. Three different methods were used to complete the QIDS-C16: (a) adolescents' responses to clinician interviews; (b) parents' responses to clinician interview; and (c) a composite score using the most pathological response from the two interviews. Both classical and item response theory methods were used. Factor analyses evaluated the dimensionality of each scale.Results: The sample included 140 adolescent outpatients. All versions of the QIDS, save the parent interview, and the CDRS-R were very reliable (α ≥ 0.8). All four versions of the QIDS are reasonably effective and unidimensional. The CDRS-R was clearly at least two-dimensional. The CDRS-R was the most discriminating among low and extremely high levels of depression. The QIDS-SR16 was the most discriminating at moderate levels of depression. There was no relation between the QIDS scores and concurrent Axis III comorbidities.Conclusion: The QIDS-C16 and the QIDS-SR16 are suitable for use in adolescents. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.321 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Adolescent | |
dc.subject | Depression | |
dc.subject | Depressive symptom ratings | |
dc.subject | Psychometrics | |
dc.subject | Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - clinician-rated | |
dc.subject | Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - self-report | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | DUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1002/mpr.321 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research | |
dc.description.volume | 19 | |
dc.description.issue | 4 | |
dc.description.page | 185-194 | |
dc.description.coden | IPSRE | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000285263000001 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.