Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1159/000235977
DC FieldValue
dc.titleIdentifying risk for attrition during treatment for depression
dc.contributor.authorWarden, D.
dc.contributor.authorTrivedi, M.H.
dc.contributor.authorWisniewski, S.R.
dc.contributor.authorLesser, I.M.
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, J.
dc.contributor.authorBalasubramani, G.K.
dc.contributor.authorFava, M.
dc.contributor.authorShores-Wilson, K.
dc.contributor.authorStegman, D.
dc.contributor.authorRush, A.J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T08:28:48Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T08:28:48Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationWarden, D., Trivedi, M.H., Wisniewski, S.R., Lesser, I.M., Mitchell, J., Balasubramani, G.K., Fava, M., Shores-Wilson, K., Stegman, D., Rush, A.J. (2009). Identifying risk for attrition during treatment for depression. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 78 (6) : 372-379. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1159/000235977
dc.identifier.issn00333190
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110122
dc.description.abstractBackground: Understanding patients' ambivalence about treatment persistence may be useful in tailoring retention interventions for individual patients with major depressive disorder. Methods: Participants (n = 265) with major depressive disorder were enrolled into an 8-week trial with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. At baseline and week 2, the participants were asked about their intent to return for the next visit, complete the study and continue in the study should they experience side effects or no improvement. Dropouts were defined as participants who discontinued attending clinic visits before completing the trial. Results: Participants who at baseline reported an uncertain/negative intent to continue if they experienced side effects or no improvement dropped out at a significantly higher rate by weeks 6 and 8. Uncertain/negative intent at week 2 predicted attrition at all following visits. Dropouts without side effects were more likely to have reported an uncertain/negative intent to attend at both baseline and week 2, while dropouts who experienced side effects were more likely to have reported an uncertain/negative intent to attend only at baseline. Positive intent to continue was associated with greater symptom improvement in both dropouts and completers despite the possibility of lack of efficacy. Conclusions: Participants' pretreatment concerns about continuing antidepressant treatment in the presence of side effects signals challenges to the completion of a full 8-week acute phase treatment, even if the participant does not develop side effects. Individualized review of concerns and tailoring appropriate interventions may be necessary to reduce attrition. Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000235977
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdherence
dc.subjectAntidepressant
dc.subjectAttitudes
dc.subjectAttrition
dc.subjectDepression
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS GRADUATE MEDICAL SCHOOL S'PORE
dc.description.doi10.1159/000235977
dc.description.sourcetitlePsychotherapy and Psychosomatics
dc.description.volume78
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page372-379
dc.description.codenPSPSB
dc.identifier.isiut000269788200010
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.