Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Endothelial cell loss and graft survival after descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty||Authors:||Ang, M.
|Issue Date:||Nov-2012||Citation:||Ang, M., Mehta, J.S., Lim, F., Bose, S., Htoon, H.M., Tan, D. (2012-11). Endothelial cell loss and graft survival after descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119 (11) : 2239-2244. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.012||Abstract:||Purpose: We sought to compare endothelial cell (EC) loss and graft survival after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in Asian eyes. Design: Retrospective, nested, cohort study. Participants: Consecutive patients who underwent DSAEK or PK with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic and aphakic bullous keratopathy (BK) at a single tertiary center from April 1, 2006, to April 1, 2008. Methods: Clinical data, and donor and recipient characteristics were recorded from our prospective cohort from the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. Main Outcome Measures: Percent EC loss and graft survival up to 3 years. Results: There were no differences in baseline characteristics of patients comparing DSAEK and PK; there were more patients with BK (n = 141, 68.4%) than Fuchs' dystrophy. Percent EC loss was lower in DSAEK compared with PK at 1 (30±22% vs 37±25%; P = 0.045), 2 (36±23% vs 45±33%; P = 0.018), and 3 years (39±24% vs 47±28%; P = 0.022) postoperatively. Graft survival was comparable (log-rank P = 0.671) between DSAEK and PK at 1 (94% vs 90%), 2 (88% vs 85%), and 3 years (87% vs 85%). Conclusions: Compared with PK, DSAEK resulted in lower EC loss with comparable cumulative graft survival rates for up to 3 years in patients with Fuchs' dystrophy and BK. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article. © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology.||Source Title:||Ophthalmology||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110058||ISSN:||01616420||DOI:||10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.012|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jun 21, 2021
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jun 14, 2021
checked on Jun 19, 2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.