Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Effect of facility on the operative costs of distal radius fractures||Authors:||Mather III, R.C.
MacK Aldridge III, J.
|Issue Date:||Jul-2011||Citation:||Mather III, R.C., Wysocki, R.W., MacK Aldridge III, J., Pietrobon, R., Nunley, J.A. (2011-07). Effect of facility on the operative costs of distal radius fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery 36 (7) : 1142-1148. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.042||Abstract:||Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether ambulatory surgery centers can deliver lower-cost care and to identify sources of those cost savings. Methods: We performed a cost identification analysis of outpatient volar plating for closed distal radius fractures at a single academic medical center. Multiple costs and time measures were taken from an internal database of 130 consecutive patients and were compared by venue of treatment, either an inpatient facility or an ambulatory, stand-alone surgery facility. The relationships between total cost and operative time and multiple variables, including fracture severity, patient age, gender, comorbidities, use of bone graft, concurrent carpal tunnel release, and surgeon experience, were examined, using multivariate analysis and regression modeling to identify other cost drivers or explanatory variables. Results: The mean operative cost was considerably greater at the inpatient facility ($7,640) than at the outpatient facility ($5,220). Cost drivers of this difference were anesthesia services, post-anesthesia care unit, and operating room costs. Total surgical time, nursing time, set-up, and operative times were 33%, 109%, 105%, and 35% longer, respectively, at the inpatient facility. There was no significant difference between facilities for the additional variables, and none of those variables independently affected cost or operative time. Conclusions: The only predictor of cost and time was facility type. This study supports the use of ambulatory stand-alone surgical facilities to achieve efficient resource utilization in the operative treatment of distal radius fractures. We also identified several specific costs and time measurements that differed between facilities, which can serve as potential targets for tertiary facilities to improve utilization. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic and Decisional Analysis III. © 2011 American Society for Surgery of the Hand.||Source Title:||Journal of Hand Surgery||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/110047||ISSN:||03635023||DOI:||10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.042|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.