Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2944
DC FieldValue
dc.titleFirst-event or marginal estimation of cause-specific hazards for analysing correlated multivariate failure-time data?
dc.contributor.authorTai, B.-C.
dc.contributor.authorDe Stavola, B.L.
dc.contributor.authorde Gruttola, V.
dc.contributor.authorGebski, V.
dc.contributor.authorMachin, D.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T07:44:43Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T07:44:43Z
dc.date.issued2008-03-15
dc.identifier.citationTai, B.-C., De Stavola, B.L., de Gruttola, V., Gebski, V., Machin, D. (2008-03-15). First-event or marginal estimation of cause-specific hazards for analysing correlated multivariate failure-time data?. Statistics in Medicine 27 (6) : 922-936. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2944
dc.identifier.issn02776715
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109346
dc.description.abstractIn the analysis of multivariate failure-time data, the effect of a treatment or an exposure on the hazard of each failure type is sometimes evaluated using only the information on the first event that occurs in every individual, ignoring all events that follow. A Cox proportional hazards model may be fitted to such data, yielding a cause-specific hazard ratio (HR) estimate of the exposure for each failure type conditional on surviving all other failure types. However, such an estimate would not fully utilize all the available information on event times. Alternatively, a marginal approach may be implemented to model the time distribution of each failure type beyond the subject's first failure to (any) second and later failures. We investigate the performance of these two approaches by simulating positive and negative correlated event times from exponential distributions. Surprisingly, our results suggest that the first-event-only method (when multiple failures are possible) performs as well as the marginal method in most practical situations. Generally, for a modest sample size of 400, it is possible to achieve at least 85 per cent coverage of the true marginal HR with the first-event method. Although the coverage is poor for a correlation of 0.7 and beyond, such a high correlation between competing event times may be biologically rather implausible. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.2944
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCause-specific hazard
dc.subjectCompeting risks
dc.subjectCorrelated multivariate failure times
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOMMUNITY,OCCUPATIONAL & FAMILY MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1002/sim.2944
dc.description.sourcetitleStatistics in Medicine
dc.description.volume27
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page922-936
dc.description.codenSMEDD
dc.identifier.isiut000253782600009
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 18, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Sep 18, 2021

Page view(s)

89
checked on Sep 16, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.