Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.011
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSocioeconomic factors affecting colorectal, breast and cervical cancer screening in an Asian urban low-income setting at baseline and post-intervention
dc.contributor.authorWee, L.E.
dc.contributor.authorKoh, G.C.H.
dc.contributor.authorChin, R.T.
dc.contributor.authorYeo, W.X.
dc.contributor.authorSeow, B.
dc.contributor.authorChua, D.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T05:05:07Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T05:05:07Z
dc.date.issued2012-07
dc.identifier.citationWee, L.E., Koh, G.C.H., Chin, R.T., Yeo, W.X., Seow, B., Chua, D. (2012-07). Socioeconomic factors affecting colorectal, breast and cervical cancer screening in an Asian urban low-income setting at baseline and post-intervention. Preventive Medicine 55 (1) : 61-67. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.011
dc.identifier.issn00917435
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/109058
dc.description.abstractBackground: Inequalities in cancer screening are little studied in Asian societies. We determined whether area and individual measures of socio-economic status (SES) affected cancer screening participation in Singapore and prospectively evaluated an access-enhancing community-based intervention. Methods: The study population involved all residents aged > 40. years in two housing estates comprising of owner-occupied (high-SES area) and rental (low-SES area) flats. From 2009 to 2011, non-adherents to regular screening for colorectal/breast/cervical cancer were offered free convenient screening over six months. Pre- and post-intervention screening rates were compared with McNemar's test. Multi-level logistic regression identified factors of regular screening at baseline; Cox regression analysis identified predictors of screening post-intervention. Results: Participation was 78.2% (1081/1383). In the low-SES area, 7.7% (33/427), 20.4% (44/216), and 14.3% (46/321) had regular colorectal, cervical and breast cancer screening respectively. Post-intervention, screening rates in the low-SES area rose significantly to 19.0% (81/427), 25.4% (55/216), and 34.3% (74/216) respectively (p< 0.001). Area SES was more consistently associated with screening than individual SES at baseline. Post-intervention, for colorectal cancer screening, those with higher education were more likely to attend (p= 0.004); for female cancer screening, the higher-income were less likely to attend (p= 0.032). Conclusions: Access-enhancing community-based interventions improve participation among disadvantaged strata of Asian societies. © 2012 Elsevier Inc..
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.011
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectCervical cancer
dc.subjectColorectal cancer
dc.subjectLow socioeconomic status
dc.subjectLow-income
dc.subjectScreening
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.011
dc.description.sourcetitlePreventive Medicine
dc.description.volume55
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page61-67
dc.description.codenPVTMA
dc.identifier.isiut000305861400012
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
checked on Aug 7, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on Jul 31, 2020

Page view(s)

82
checked on Aug 1, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.