Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|dc.title||Socioeconomic factors affecting colorectal, breast and cervical cancer screening in an Asian urban low-income setting at baseline and post-intervention|
|dc.identifier.citation||Wee, L.E., Koh, G.C.H., Chin, R.T., Yeo, W.X., Seow, B., Chua, D. (2012-07). Socioeconomic factors affecting colorectal, breast and cervical cancer screening in an Asian urban low-income setting at baseline and post-intervention. Preventive Medicine 55 (1) : 61-67. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.011|
|dc.description.abstract||Background: Inequalities in cancer screening are little studied in Asian societies. We determined whether area and individual measures of socio-economic status (SES) affected cancer screening participation in Singapore and prospectively evaluated an access-enhancing community-based intervention. Methods: The study population involved all residents aged > 40. years in two housing estates comprising of owner-occupied (high-SES area) and rental (low-SES area) flats. From 2009 to 2011, non-adherents to regular screening for colorectal/breast/cervical cancer were offered free convenient screening over six months. Pre- and post-intervention screening rates were compared with McNemar's test. Multi-level logistic regression identified factors of regular screening at baseline; Cox regression analysis identified predictors of screening post-intervention. Results: Participation was 78.2% (1081/1383). In the low-SES area, 7.7% (33/427), 20.4% (44/216), and 14.3% (46/321) had regular colorectal, cervical and breast cancer screening respectively. Post-intervention, screening rates in the low-SES area rose significantly to 19.0% (81/427), 25.4% (55/216), and 34.3% (74/216) respectively (p< 0.001). Area SES was more consistently associated with screening than individual SES at baseline. Post-intervention, for colorectal cancer screening, those with higher education were more likely to attend (p= 0.004); for female cancer screening, the higher-income were less likely to attend (p= 0.032). Conclusions: Access-enhancing community-based interventions improve participation among disadvantaged strata of Asian societies. © 2012 Elsevier Inc..|
|dc.subject||Low socioeconomic status|
|dc.contributor.department||SAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.