Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Accuracy and User-Acceptability of HIV Self-Testing Using an Oral Fluid-Based HIV Rapid Test||Authors:||Ng, O.T.
|Issue Date:||17-Sep-2012||Citation:||Ng, O.T., Chow, A.L., Lee, V.J., Chen, M.I.C., Win, M.K., Tan, H.H., Chua, A., Leo, Y.S. (2012-09-17). Accuracy and User-Acceptability of HIV Self-Testing Using an Oral Fluid-Based HIV Rapid Test. PLoS ONE 7 (9) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045168||Abstract:||Background: The United States FDA approved an over-the-counter HIV self-test, to facilitate increased HIV testing and earlier linkage to care. We assessed the accuracy of self-testing by untrained participants compared to healthcare worker (HCW) testing, participants' ability to interpret sample results and user-acceptability of self-tests in Singapore. Methodology/Principal Findings: A cross-sectional study, involving 200 known HIV-positive patients and 794 unknown HIV status at-risk participants was conducted. Participants (all without prior self-test experience) performed self-testing guided solely by visual instructions, followed by HCW testing, both using the OraQuick ADVANCE Rapid HIV 1/2 Antibody Test, with both results interpreted by the HCW. To assess ability to interpret results, participants were provided 3 sample results (positive, negative, and invalid) to interpret. Of 192 participants who tested positive on HCW testing, self-testing was positive in 186 (96.9%), negative in 5 (2.6%), and invalid in 1 (0.5%). Of 794 participants who tested negative on HCW testing, self-testing was negative in 791 (99.6%), positive in 1 (0.1%), and invalid in 2 (0.3%). Excluding invalid tests, self-testing had sensitivity of 97.4% (95% CI 95.1% to 99.7%) and specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.6% to 100%). When interpreting results, 96%, 93.1% and 95.2% correctly read the positive, negative and invalid respectively. There were no significant demographic predictors for false negative self-testing or wrongly interpreting positive or invalid sample results as negative. Eighty-seven percent would purchase the kit over-the-counter; 89% preferred to take HIV tests in private. 72.5% and 74.9% felt the need for pre- and post-test counseling respectively. Only 28% would pay at least USD15 for the test. Conclusions/Significance: Self-testing was associated with high specificity, and a small but significant number of false negatives. Incorrectly identifying model results as invalid was a major reason for incorrect result interpretation. Survey responses were supportive of making self-testing available. © 2012 Ng et al.||Source Title:||PLoS ONE||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108859||ISSN:||19326203||DOI:||10.1371/journal.pone.0045168|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|2012-Accuracy_and_User-Acceptability_of_HIV-published.PDF||153.84 kB||Adobe PDF|
checked on Feb 19, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Feb 12, 2020
checked on Feb 15, 2020
checked on Feb 15, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.