Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20504
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA method comparison study to validate a novel parameter of obesity, the body adiposity index, in chinese subjects
dc.contributor.authorLam, B.C.C.
dc.contributor.authorLim, S.C.
dc.contributor.authorWong, M.T.K.
dc.contributor.authorShum, E.
dc.contributor.authorHo, C.Y.
dc.contributor.authorBosco, J.I.E.
dc.contributor.authorChen, C.
dc.contributor.authorKoh, G.C.H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T02:11:54Z
dc.date.available2014-11-26T02:11:54Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationLam, B.C.C., Lim, S.C., Wong, M.T.K., Shum, E., Ho, C.Y., Bosco, J.I.E., Chen, C., Koh, G.C.H. (2013-12). A method comparison study to validate a novel parameter of obesity, the body adiposity index, in chinese subjects. Obesity 21 (12) : E634-E639. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20504
dc.identifier.issn19307381
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108710
dc.description.abstractObjective A recently developed parameter, the body adiposity index (BAI)-a composite index based on hip circumference and height-estimates the percentage (%) body adiposity indirectly. The BAI was compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometer (DEXA)-derived % adiposity to validate the BAI in the local Chinese population. Design and Methods 105 Chinese were recruited and % adiposity estimated by BAI was compared with that derived from DEXA using the Bland Altman plot. A correlation study comparing the BAI with body mass index (BMI) was also done. Results BAI underestimated DEXA-derived % adiposity by a mean of 5.77% with 95% limits of agreement of ±8.4%. When stratified by gender, BMI correlated with DEXA-derived % adiposity better than BAI (r = 0.81 vs. 0.74 for males, P = 0.088, and r = 0.87 vs. 0.82 for females, P = 0.087). Hip circumference and waist circumference also correlated better with the BMI than BAI (r = 0.94 vs. 0.71 for hip circumference, P < 0.001, and r = 0.93 vs. 0.50 for waist circumference, P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions The BAI underestimates DEXA-derived % adiposity in a Chinese population in Singapore and is unlikely to be a better overall index of adiposity than the established BMI. Copyright © 2013 The Obesity Society.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20504
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1002/oby.20504
dc.description.sourcetitleObesity
dc.description.volume21
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.pageE634-E639
dc.identifier.isiut000329614200015
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Jan 17, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Jan 10, 2020

Page view(s)

95
checked on Jan 11, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.