Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Investigation of causes of oseltamivir chemoprophylaxis failures during influenza A (H1N1-2009) outbreaks||Authors:||Lee, V.J.
|Keywords:||Influenza A (H1N1-2009)
|Issue Date:||Feb-2011||Citation:||Lee, V.J., Yap, J., Maurer-Stroh, S., Lee, R.T.C., Eisenhaber, F., Tay, J.K., Ting, P.J., Loh, J.P., Wong, C.W., Tan, B.H., Koay, E.S.C., Kelly, P.M., Hibberd, M.L. (2011-02). Investigation of causes of oseltamivir chemoprophylaxis failures during influenza A (H1N1-2009) outbreaks. Journal of Clinical Virology 50 (2) : 104-108. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2010.10.004||Abstract:||Background: Antiviral post-exposure prophylaxis with oseltamivir has been used as a strategy in mitigating the Influenza A (H1N1-2009) pandemic. There have been few reports of well-documented prophylaxis failures and the reasons for failure. Objectives: We report herein a series of 10 cases of prophylaxis failures and explore the reasons behind their prophylaxis failure. Study design: In the early pandemic phase, the military employed oseltamivir post-exposure ring-prophylaxis of affected units. From June 22 to July 30, 2009, cases of laboratory-confirmed prophylaxis failures were identified. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and tested by PCR. Samples with sufficient RNA material were sent for whole genome sequencing, and screened for mutations that confer oseltamivir resistance, especially the H275Y mutation. Results: Ten cases of laboratory-confirmed prophylaxis failure were identified, with a mean age of 22.3 years. One case was asymptomatic; the remaining 9 had fever or cough but without severe complications. The mean duration of exposure before starting oseltamivir was 1.9 days (SD 0.9), while the mean duration of oseltamivir consumption before symptom onset was 1.9 days (SD 1.4). None of the samples had the H275Y mutation or other known mutations that confer resistance. From the whole genome sequencing, several mutations at the HA (T220S, E275V, T333A, D239G); PB2 (K660R, L607V, V292I); NS1 (F103S), and NP (W104G) gene segments were detected, but none of them were likely to result in anti-viral resistance. Conclusions: Primary prophylaxis failures exhibited mild symptoms without complications; all did not have the H275Y mutation and were unlikely to result from other mutations. © 2010 Elsevier B.V.||Source Title:||Journal of Clinical Virology||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/108441||ISSN:||13866532||DOI:||10.1016/j.jcv.2010.10.004|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Oct 19, 2021
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Oct 19, 2021
checked on Oct 14, 2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.