Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000535
DC FieldValue
dc.titleRobust inference for univariate proportional hazards frailty regression models
dc.contributor.authorKosorok, M.R.
dc.contributor.authorLee, B.L.
dc.contributor.authorFine, J.P.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-28T05:17:02Z
dc.date.available2014-10-28T05:17:02Z
dc.date.issued2004-08
dc.identifier.citationKosorok, M.R., Lee, B.L., Fine, J.P. (2004-08). Robust inference for univariate proportional hazards frailty regression models. Annals of Statistics 32 (4) : 1448-1491. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000535
dc.identifier.issn00905364
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/105503
dc.description.abstractWe consider a class of semiparametric regression models which are one-parameter extensions of the Cox [J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 34 (1972) 187-220] model for right-censored univariate failure times. These models assume that the hazard given the covariates and a random frailty unique to each individual has the proportional hazards form multiplied by the frailty. The frailty is assumed to have mean 1 within a known one-parameter family of distributions. Inference is based on a nonparametric likelihood. The behavior of the likelihood maximizer is studied under general conditions where the fitted model may be misspecified. The joint estimator of the regression and frailty parameters as well as the baseline hazard is shown to be uniformly consistent for the pseudo-value maximizing the asymptotic limit of the likelihood. Appropriately standardized, the estimator converges weakly to a Gaussian process. When the model is correctly specified, the procedure is semiparametric efficient, achieving the semiparametric information bound for all parameter components. It is also proved that the bootstrap gives valid inferences for all parameters, even under misspecification. We demonstrate analytically the importance of the robust inference in several examples. In a randomized clinical trial, a valid test of the treatment effect is possible when other prognostic factors and the frailty distribution are both misspecified. Under certain conditions on the covariates, the ratios of the regression parameters are still identifiable. The practical utility of the procedure is illustrated on a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma dataset. © Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2004.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000535
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEmpirical process
dc.subjectImplied parameter
dc.subjectLaplace transform
dc.subjectMisspecification
dc.subjectNonparametric maximum likelihood
dc.subjectSemiparametric information bound
dc.subjectUnobservable heterogeneity
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentSTATISTICS & APPLIED PROBABILITY
dc.description.doi10.1214/009053604000000535
dc.description.sourcetitleAnnals of Statistics
dc.description.volume32
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page1448-1491
dc.identifier.isiut000223519100005
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.