Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x
Title: Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses
Authors: Tscharntke, T.
Tylianakis, J.M.
Rand, T.A.
Didham, R.K.
Fahrig, L.
Batáry, P.
Bengtsson, J.
Clough, Y.
Crist, T.O.
Dormann, C.F.
Ewers, R.M.
Fründ, J.
Holt, R.D.
Holzschuh, A.
Klein, A.M.
Kleijn, D.
Kremen, C.
Landis, D.A.
Laurance, W.
Lindenmayer, D.
Scherber, C.
Sodhi, N. 
Steffan-Dewenter, I.
Thies, C.
van der Putten, W.H.
Westphal, C.
Keywords: Belowground-aboveground patterns
Beta diversity
Conservation management
Ecosystem functioning and services
Functional traits
Insurance hypothesis
Landscape composition and configuration
Multitrophic interactions
Resilience and stability
Spatial heterogeneity
Issue Date: Aug-2012
Citation: Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J.M., Rand, T.A., Didham, R.K., Fahrig, L., Batáry, P., Bengtsson, J., Clough, Y., Crist, T.O., Dormann, C.F., Ewers, R.M., Fründ, J., Holt, R.D., Holzschuh, A., Klein, A.M., Kleijn, D., Kremen, C., Landis, D.A., Laurance, W., Lindenmayer, D., Scherber, C., Sodhi, N., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Thies, C., van der Putten, W.H., Westphal, C. (2012-08). Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses. Biological Reviews 87 (3) : 661-685. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x
Abstract: Understanding how landscape characteristics affect biodiversity patterns and ecological processes at local and landscape scales is critical for mitigating effects of global environmental change. In this review, we use knowledge gained from human-modified landscapes to suggest eight hypotheses, which we hope will encourage more systematic research on the role of landscape composition and configuration in determining the structure of ecological communities, ecosystem functioning and services. We organize the eight hypotheses under four overarching themes. Section A: 'landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns' includes (1) the landscape species pool hypothesis-the size of the landscape-wide species pool moderates local (alpha) biodiversity, and (2) the dominance of beta diversity hypothesis-landscape-moderated dissimilarity of local communities determines landscape-wide biodiversity and overrides negative local effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Section B: 'landscape moderation of population dynamics' includes (3) the cross-habitat spillover hypothesis-landscape-moderated spillover of energy, resources and organisms across habitats, including between managed and natural ecosystems, influences landscape-wide community structure and associated processes and (4) the landscape-moderated concentration and dilution hypothesis-spatial and temporal changes in landscape composition can cause transient concentration or dilution of populations with functional consequences. Section C: 'landscape moderation of functional trait selection' includes (5) the landscape-moderated functional trait selection hypothesis-landscape moderation of species trait selection shapes the functional role and trajectory of community assembly, and (6) the landscape-moderated insurance hypothesis-landscape complexity provides spatial and temporal insurance, i.e. high resilience and stability of ecological processes in changing environments. Section D: 'landscape constraints on conservation management' includes (7) the intermediate landscape-complexity hypothesis-landscape-moderated effectiveness of local conservation management is highest in structurally simple, rather than in cleared (i.e. extremely simplified) or in complex landscapes, and (8) the landscape-moderated biodiversity versus ecosystem service management hypothesis-landscape-moderated biodiversity conservation to optimize functional diversity and related ecosystem services will not protect endangered species. Shifting our research focus from local to landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity will be critical to developing solutions for future biodiversity and ecosystem service management. © 2012 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2012 Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Source Title: Biological Reviews
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/102480
ISSN: 14647931
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

910
checked on Oct 27, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

885
checked on Oct 20, 2020

Page view(s)

428
checked on Oct 10, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.