Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00060-9
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSequence and structural diversity in endotoxin-binding dodecapeptides
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Y.
dc.contributor.authorBow Ho
dc.contributor.authorDing, J.L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-27T08:39:28Z
dc.date.available2014-10-27T08:39:28Z
dc.date.issued2003-04-01
dc.identifier.citationZhu, Y., Bow Ho, Ding, J.L. (2003-04-01). Sequence and structural diversity in endotoxin-binding dodecapeptides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes 1611 (1-2) : 234-242. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00060-9
dc.identifier.issn00052736
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/101648
dc.description.abstractFor the study of sequence or structure requirement of short peptides for endotoxin binding, and to search for potential endotoxin antagonists, biopanning was carried out on a phage-displayed random dodecapeptide library against immobilized lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or lipid A (LA), the core toxic portion of LPS. Specific binding of selected phage-displayed peptides to LPS/LA was confirmed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis. These peptides are rich in basic and hydrophobic amino acids, especially histidine, proline and tryptophan, highlighting apparent amphiphilicity and bacterial membrane activity. These dodecapeptide sequences have no predictable secondary structure in solution, indicating the importance of a random structure before their interaction with LPS/LA. Sequence alignment reveals various potential secondary structures with these selected peptides, which contain specific signature motifs such as b(p)hb(p)hb(p), bbbb, hhhh (b - basic, p - polar, h - hydrophobic residue), capable of binding LPS/LA. However, none of these peptides exhibit a significant calculated structural amphiphilicity while assuming a secondary structure. This study suggests that for these short dodecapeptides to bind LPS/LA, the potential for their structural adaptation is more important than an amphipathic structure. © 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00060-9
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAmphiphilicity
dc.subjectEndotoxin antagonist
dc.subjectEndotoxin-binding motif
dc.subjectPhage-displayed peptide
dc.subjectSurface plasmon resonance (SPR)
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.description.doi10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00060-9
dc.description.sourcetitleBiochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes
dc.description.volume1611
dc.description.issue1-2
dc.description.page234-242
dc.description.codenBBBMB
dc.identifier.isiut000181996600027
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.