Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Factors Affecting Tropical Tree Damage and Survival after Catastrophic Wind Disturbance||Authors:||Webb, E.L.
van de Bult, M.
|Issue Date:||Jan-2014||Citation:||Webb, E.L., van de Bult, M., Fa'aumu, S., Webb, R.C., Tualaulelei, A., Carrasco, L.R. (2014-01). Factors Affecting Tropical Tree Damage and Survival after Catastrophic Wind Disturbance. Biotropica 46 (1) : 32-41. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12067||Abstract:||The structure and dynamics of cyclone-prone tropical forests are driven in part by variation in tree species resistance to and survival after wind-induced structural damage. We determined the factors associated with tree damage and 3-yr survival following Category 5 Cyclone Olaf on the Polynesian island of Ta'u, American Samoa. Despite sustaining a high rate of severe damage (34.6% of all trees snapped, 23.0% uprooted), system resilience was high with 74.3 percent stem survival overall and an annual mortality rate of 7.9 percent compared with 2.1 percent in nearby undisturbed late successional forest. Three-yr survival rate of trees sustaining severe damage was 63.1 percent, compared to about 89 percent for trees sustaining only branch loss or defoliation. Three-yr survival differed according to damage type, 78.5 percent after snapping vs. 38.4 percent after uprooting. Species differed widely in resistance to and survival after snapping and uprooting. Several species and individual traits were associated with the probability of snapping or uprooting; however, wood density was the only species trait consistently, and negatively, associated with the probability of sustaining either damage type. Survival after snapping was negatively associated with the proportion of the tree snapped off, which was determined by individual tree architecture. Species growth rate was negatively associated with survival after uprooting, indicating the importance of shade tolerance for survival after uprooting. Thus, whereas species traits seemed to exclusively underpin resistance to and survival after uprooting, they only partly accounted for snapping resistance, and did not determine the intensity of snap damage or survival after snapping. Our results highlight the importance of considering each damage type separately when considering ecological trade-offs. © 2013 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.||Source Title:||Biotropica||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/100662||ISSN:||00063606||DOI:||10.1111/btp.12067|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on May 29, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on May 21, 2020
checked on May 10, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.