Factors affecting choice of sponsoring institution for residency among medical students in Singapore
Ng, Chew Lip Liu, Xuan Dao Govind, Renuka Murali Tan, Jonathan Wei Jian Ooi, Shirley Beng Suat Archuleta, Sophia
Ng, Chew Lip
Liu, Xuan Dao
Govind, Renuka Murali
Tan, Jonathan Wei Jian
Citations
Altmetric:
Alternative Title
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postgraduate medical education in Singapore underwent a major transition recently, from a British-style system and accreditation to a competency-based residency programme modelled after the American system. We aimed to identify the relative importance of factors influencing the choice of sponsoring institution (SI) for residency among medical students during this transition period. METHODS A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of Singapore undergraduate medical students across all years of study was performed in 2011. Participants rated the degree of importance of 45 factors (including research, academia and education, marketing, reputation of faculty, working conditions, posting experience and influence by peers/seniors) to their choice of SIs on a five-point Likert scale. Differences in gender and seniority were compared. RESULTS 705 out of 1,274 students completed the survey (response rate 55.3%). The top five influencing factors were guidance by mentor (4.48 ± 0.74), reputation for good teaching (4.46 ± 0.76), personal overall experience in SI (4.41 ± 0.88), quality of mentorship and supervision (4.41 ± 0.75), and quality and quantity of teaching (4.37 ± 0.78). The five lowest-rated factors were social networking (2.91 ± 1.00), SI security (3.01 ± 1.07), open house impact (3.15 ± 0.96), advertising paraphernalia (3.17 ± 0.95) and research publications (3.21 ± 1.00). Female students attributed more importance to security and a positive working environment. Preclinical students rated research and marketing aspects more highly, while clinical students valued a positive working environment more. CONCLUSION Quality of education, mentorship, experiences during clerkship and a positive working environment were the most important factors influencing the choice of SI.
Keywords
Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Medicine, General & Internal, General & Internal Medicine, ACGME-I, factors, medical students, residency, MENTORSHIP, SELECTION
Source Title
SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL
Publisher
SINGAPORE MEDICAL ASSOC
Series/Report No.
Collections
Rights
Date
2018-12-01
DOI
10.11622/smedj.2018024
Type
Article