Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||"My appointment received the sanction of the Admiralty": Why Charles Darwin really was the naturalist on HMS Beagle|
|Authors:||Van Wyhe, J.|
|Citation:||Van Wyhe, J. (2013-09). "My appointment received the sanction of the Admiralty": Why Charles Darwin really was the naturalist on HMS Beagle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3) : 316-326. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.03.022|
|Abstract:||For decades historians of science and science writers in general have maintained that Charles Darwin was not the 'naturalist' or 'official naturalist' during the 1831-1836 surveying voyage of HMS Beagle but instead Captain Robert FitzRoy's 'companion', 'gentleman companion' or 'dining companion'. That is, Darwin was primarily the captain's social companion and only secondarily and unofficially naturalist. Instead, it is usually maintained, the ship's surgeon Robert McCormick was the official naturalist because this was the default or official practice at the time. Although these views have been repeated in countless accounts of Darwin's life, this essay aims to show that they are incorrect. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.|
|Source Title:||Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jan 16, 2019
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jan 1, 2019
checked on Jan 11, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.