Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.569733
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Understanding risky bidding: A prospect-contingent perspective | |
dc.contributor.author | Hartono, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yap, C.M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-07T10:26:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-07T10:26:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hartono, B., Yap, C.M. (2011-06). Understanding risky bidding: A prospect-contingent perspective. Construction Management and Economics 29 (6) : 579-593. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.569733 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 01446193 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/87302 | |
dc.description.abstract | A descriptive research school of thought provides the context for an examination of contractors' risky bid markup decisions in a competitive bidding setting. Grounded in prospect theory and the one-reason decision model, a contingency-based theoretical model was developed to explain and to predict bid mark-up decisions in light of four identified determinants, namely: perceived 'rate of returns', 'revenues', 'project backlogs' and 'project strategic importance'. Three scenarios according to this model were verified by means of a self-administered survey in the Singapore construction industry. By using cluster analysis, five groups of bidders with distinctive bid profiles were identified and the associated bid mark-ups were calculated. The emerging groups provide an empirical illustration on how the theoretical model is utilized. For instance, one group of bidders (n = 16) demonstrates a scenario of the model in which participating bidders had considered the reported project bid as having high strategic importance to their organizations and hence made aggressive, low bid mark-ups. The theoretically grounded framework could be used by contractors to improve their own bidding strategy in anticipating the likely behaviour of the competitors. © 2011 Taylor & Francis. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.569733 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Bidding | |
dc.subject | Cluster analysis | |
dc.subject | Contingency | |
dc.subject | Mark-up | |
dc.subject | Prospect theory | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | INDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1080/01446193.2011.569733 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Construction Management and Economics | |
dc.description.volume | 29 | |
dc.description.issue | 6 | |
dc.description.page | 579-593 | |
dc.description.coden | CMECF | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000213304600004 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.