Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645740
DC FieldValue
dc.titleRVE hybrid slim sector model for efficient analysis of solder joint reliability
dc.contributor.authorZhao, B.
dc.contributor.authorTay, A.A.O.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-07T09:15:32Z
dc.date.available2014-10-07T09:15:32Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationZhao, B., Tay, A.A.O. (2006). RVE hybrid slim sector model for efficient analysis of solder joint reliability. Proceedings - Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006 : 740-747. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645740
dc.identifier.isbn1424401526
dc.identifier.issn05695503
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/86073
dc.description.abstractWith the relentless trend in ever-increasing number of I/Os on packages and the decreasing pitch of interconnects on packages, the task of modeling the fatigue life of the interconnects is becoming evermore challenging. This paper presents a RVE hybrid slim sector model which could be employed to meet the challenge. In this model, almost all the interconnects between chip and substrate are replaced by an equivalent layer except for a few including and around the critical interconnect. The effective mechanical properties of the equivalent continuum layer are evaluated using a 3-D representative volume element (RVE) based on continuum mechanics and a numerical homogenization method. Formulae to extract the effective material constants are derived using elasticity theory. With finite element analysis of four cases of loading to the RVE, a transversely Isotropic plasticity model is developed. Characteristic parameters for Hill's formulation are extracted from the numerical experiments. Temperature dependent mechanical properties are taken into account. A thermomechanical analysis of a 6×6mm 2 flip chip package was carried out the RVE hybrid sum sector model and compared with the detailed one-eight model. The results show that the differences in displacements computed is about 3-5%. Consequently, the error percentage in the maximum inelastic shear strain and fatigue life prediction is about 5% and 9%, respectively. The improvement in efficiency in terms of preprocessing and computational time is enormous. © 2006 IEEE.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645740
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645740
dc.description.sourcetitleProceedings - Electronic Components and Technology Conference
dc.description.volume2006
dc.description.page740-747
dc.description.codenPECCA
dc.identifier.isiut000238566600117
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.