Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4714547
Title: Comparison of bit-patterned media fabricated by methods of direct deposition and ion-milling of cobalt/palladium multilayers
Authors: Thiyagarajah, N. 
Huang, T.
Chen, Y.
Duan, H.
Song, D.L.Y.
Huei Leong, S.
Yang, J.K.W.
Ng, V. 
Issue Date: 15-May-2012
Citation: Thiyagarajah, N., Huang, T., Chen, Y., Duan, H., Song, D.L.Y., Huei Leong, S., Yang, J.K.W., Ng, V. (2012-05-15). Comparison of bit-patterned media fabricated by methods of direct deposition and ion-milling of cobalt/palladium multilayers. Journal of Applied Physics 111 (10) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4714547
Abstract: In the fabrication of bit-patterned media (BPM), two processes are commonly used, i.e., the pattern transfer by ion-milling into an underlying film of magnetic material, and the direct deposition of the magnetic material onto a pre-patterned substrate. We experimentally compared the switching performance of the BPM based on Co/Pd multilayers fabricated using these methods in terms of their switching field distribution (SFD) and physical characteristics of the bits. Our results show that both methods resulted in a narrow (∼15) SFD at low areal recording densities of ∼0.15 Tdot/in 2. However, at higher densities of up to 0.6 Tdot/in 2, the SFD of the ion-milled samples detrimentally broadened to ∼30 while the BPM from the direct-deposition method maintained its narrow SFD up to a high bit density of 0.6 Tdot/in 2. Our results suggest that in Co/Pd multilayer systems, the direct-deposition method, which produces more uniform bit sizes and profiles especially at high bit densities, is a more promising approach to achieving high-density BPM. © 2012 American Institute of Physics.
Source Title: Journal of Applied Physics
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/83564
ISSN: 00218979
DOI: 10.1063/1.4714547
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 18, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Sep 18, 2018

Page view(s)

32
checked on Sep 7, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.