Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00036-0
Title: A comparative study of neural network and Box-Jenkins ARIMA modeling in time series prediction
Authors: Ho, S.L.
Xie, M. 
Goh, T.N. 
Keywords: Box-Jenkins autoregressive integrated moving average model
Multi-layer feed-forward neural network
Recurrent neural network
Issue Date: 11-Apr-2002
Source: Ho, S.L., Xie, M., Goh, T.N. (2002-04-11). A comparative study of neural network and Box-Jenkins ARIMA modeling in time series prediction. Computers and Industrial Engineering 42 (2-4) : 371-375. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00036-0
Abstract: This paper aims to investigate suitable time series models for repairable system failure analysis. A comparative study of the Box-Jenkins autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models and the artificial neural network models in predicting failures are carried out. The neural network architectures evaluated are the multi-layer feed-forward network and the recurrent network. Simulation results on a set of compressor failures showed that in modeling the stochastic nature of reliability data, both the ARIMA and the recurrent neural network (RNN) models outperform the feed-forward model; in terms of lower predictive errors and higher percentage of correct reversal detection. However, both models perform better with short term forecasting. The effect of varying the damped feedback weights in the recurrent net is also investigated and it was found that RNN at the optimal weighting factor gives satisfactory performances compared to the ARIMA model. © 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
Source Title: Computers and Industrial Engineering
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/72231
ISSN: 03608352
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00036-0
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

120
checked on Dec 14, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

95
checked on Nov 20, 2017

Page view(s)

73
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.