Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.035
Title: A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds
Authors: Ho, S.T.
Hutmacher, D.W. 
Keywords: Micro CT
Scaffold characterization
Issue Date: Mar-2006
Source: Ho, S.T., Hutmacher, D.W. (2006-03). A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 27 (8) : 1362-1376. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.035
Abstract: The structure and architecture of scaffolds are crucial factors in scaffold-based tissue engineering as they affect the functionality of the tissue engineered constructs and the eventual application in health care. Therefore, effective scaffold assessment techniques are required right at the initial stages of research and development so as to select or design scaffolds with suitable properties. Various techniques have been developed in evaluating these important features and the outcome of the assessment is the eventual improvement on the subsequent design of the scaffold. An effective evaluation approach should be fast, accurate and non-destructive, while providing a comprehensive overview of the various morphological and architectural characteristics. Current assessment techniques would include theoretical calculation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), mercury and flow porosimetry, gas pycnometry, gas adsorption and micro computed tomography (CT). Micro CT is a more recent method of examining the characteristics of scaffolds and this review aims to highlight this current approach while comparing it with other techniques. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source Title: Biomaterials
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/68079
ISSN: 01429612
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.035
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

271
checked on Mar 7, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

248
checked on Mar 7, 2018

Page view(s)

111
checked on Apr 20, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.