Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047406
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCSF and Brain Structural Imaging Markers of the Alzheimer's Pathological Cascade
dc.contributor.authorYang, X.
dc.contributor.authorTan, M.Z.
dc.contributor.authorQiu, A.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T09:43:04Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T09:43:04Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-19
dc.identifier.citationYang, X., Tan, M.Z., Qiu, A. (2012-12-19). CSF and Brain Structural Imaging Markers of the Alzheimer's Pathological Cascade. PLoS ONE 7 (12) : -. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047406
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/66987
dc.description.abstractCerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and structural imaging markers are suggested as biomarkers amended to existing diagnostic criteria of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). But there is no clear instruction on which markers should be used at which stage of dementia. This study aimed to first investigate associations of the CSF markers as well as volumes and shapes of the hippocampus and lateral ventricles with MCI and AD at the baseline and secondly apply these baseline markers to predict MCI conversion in a two-year time using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. Our results suggested that the CSF markers, including Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau, distinguished MCI or AD from NC, while the Aβ42 CSF marker contributed to the differentiation between MCI and AD. The hippocampal shapes performed better than the hippocampal volumes in classifying NC and MCI, NC and AD, as well as MCI and AD. Interestingly, the ventricular volumes were better than the ventricular shapes to distinguish MCI or AD from NC, while the ventricular shapes showed better accuracy than the ventricular volumes in classifying MCI and AD. As the CSF markers and the structural markers are complementary, the combination of them showed great improvements in the classification accuracies of MCI and AD. Moreover, the combination of these markers showed high sensitivity but low specificity for predicting conversion from MCI to AD in two years. Hence, it is feasible to employ a cross-sectional sample to investigate dynamic associations of the CSF and imaging markers with MCI and AD and to predict future MCI conversion. In particular, the volumetric information may be good for the early stage of AD, while morphological shapes should be considered as markers in the prediction of MCI conversion to AD together with the CSF markers. © 2012 Yang et al.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047406
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBIOENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0047406
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.page-
dc.identifier.isiut000312694300003
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2012-CSF_brain_structural_imaging_markers-pub.pdf815.56 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.