Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2011.08.002
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEvaluation of integrated differential evolution and unified bare-bones particle swarm optimization for phase equilibrium and stability problems
dc.contributor.authorZhang, H.
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Vargas, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorRangaiah, G.P.
dc.contributor.authorBonilla-Petriciolet, A.
dc.contributor.authorSegovia-Hernández, J.G.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T07:40:35Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T07:40:35Z
dc.date.issued2011-11-25
dc.identifier.citationZhang, H., Fernández-Vargas, J.A., Rangaiah, G.P., Bonilla-Petriciolet, A., Segovia-Hernández, J.G. (2011-11-25). Evaluation of integrated differential evolution and unified bare-bones particle swarm optimization for phase equilibrium and stability problems. Fluid Phase Equilibria 310 (1-2) : 129-141. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2011.08.002
dc.identifier.issn03783812
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/63875
dc.description.abstractPhase equilibrium calculations and phase stability analysis play a significant role in the simulation, design and optimization of separation processes in chemical engineering. These are very challenging problems due to the high non-linearity of thermodynamic models. Global optimization methods are required in order to solve these complex, non-convex optimization problems. Recently, stochastic global optimization algorithms were applied to solve these problems. However, these optimization methods have some parameters that need to be tuned in order to obtain good reliability and efficiency. In this study, we introduce three global optimization algorithms developed by our group for phase and chemical equilibrium calculations, namely, unified bare-bones particle swarm optimization (UBBPSO), integrated differential evolution (IDE) and IDE without tabu list and radius (IDE_N), which have fewer control parameters to be tuned. The performance of these three stochastic algorithms is tested and compared in order to identify their relative strengths for phase equilibrium and phase stability problems. The phase equilibrium problems include both without and with chemical reactions. Our results show that the effectiveness of the stochastic methods tested depends on the stopping criterion. Overall, IDE has achieved better performance for the phase equilibrium, chemical equilibrium and phase stability problems. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2011.08.002
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBare-bones particle swarm optimization
dc.subjectChemical equilibrium calculations
dc.subjectIntegrated differential evolution
dc.subjectPhase equilibrium calculations
dc.subjectPhase stability analysis
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCHEMICAL & BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.fluid.2011.08.002
dc.description.sourcetitleFluid Phase Equilibria
dc.description.volume310
dc.description.issue1-2
dc.description.page129-141
dc.description.codenFPEQD
dc.identifier.isiut000297192900017
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.