Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Objective assessment of increase in breathing resistance of N95 respirators on human subjects
Authors: Lee, H.P. 
Wang, D.Y.
Keywords: flow resistance
N95 respirators
Issue Date: Oct-2011
Citation: Lee, H.P., Wang, D.Y. (2011-10). Objective assessment of increase in breathing resistance of N95 respirators on human subjects. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 55 (8) : 917-921. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Abstract: Face masks or respirators are commonly worn by medical professionals and patients for protection against respiratory tract infection and the spread of illnesses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and pandemic influenza (H1N1). Breathing discomfort due to increased breathing resistance is known to be a problem with the use of N95 respirators but there is a lack of scientific data to quantify this effect. The purpose of this study was to assess objectively the impact of wearing N95 face masks on breathing resistance. A total of 14 normal adult volunteers (seven males and seven females) were recruited in this study. Nasal airflow resistance during inspiration and expiration was measured using a standard rhinomanometry and nasal spirometry. A modified full face mask was produced in-house in order to measure nasal resistance with the use of N95 (3M 8210) respirators. The results showed a mean increment of 126 and 122% in inspiratory and expiratory flow resistances, respectively, with the use of N95 respirators. There was also an average reduction of 37% in air exchange volume with the use of N95 respirators. This is the first reported study that demonstrates quantitatively and objectively the substantial impairment of nasal airflow in terms of increased breathing resistance with the use of N95 respirators on actual human subjects. © The Author 2011.
Source Title: Annals of Occupational Hygiene
ISSN: 00034878
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mer065
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


checked on Oct 11, 2018


checked on Oct 2, 2018

Page view(s)

checked on Oct 13, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.