Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-003-0462-z
Title: Comparison between the radial point interpolation and the Kriging interpolation used in meshfree methods
Authors: Dai, K.Y. 
Liu, G.R.
Lim, K.M. 
Gu, Y.T.
Keywords: Kriging method
Meshfree method
Point interpolation method
Radial basis functions
Issue Date: Sep-2003
Source: Dai, K.Y., Liu, G.R., Lim, K.M., Gu, Y.T. (2003-09). Comparison between the radial point interpolation and the Kriging interpolation used in meshfree methods. Computational Mechanics 32 (1-2) : 60-70. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-003-0462-z
Abstract: The radial point interpolation method (RPIM) based on local supported radial basis function (RBF) and the Galerkin weak form has been developed and successfully applied to many engineering problems. Recently, a new meshfree method was proposed based on the universal moving Kriging interpolation. This paper studies the difference between the meshfree shape functions created based on the point interpolation and the Kriging interpolation. It is found that both the two methods yield the same shape function as long as the same radial basis function or semivariogram is adopted for interpolation. Although the two methods lead to the same shape function, the theorem in Kriging formulation may provide an alternative theoretical support for the RPIM. Some common semivariograms used in Kriging may also be incorporated in the RPIM. In addition, in order to satisfy the conformability requirements, a penalty technique is introduced in this paper to form a conforming Kriging, which can pass the standard patch test exactly.
Source Title: Computational Mechanics
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/59738
ISSN: 01787675
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-003-0462-z
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

63
checked on Dec 13, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

56
checked on Nov 16, 2017

Page view(s)

27
checked on Dec 16, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.