Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(95)00133-6
Title: Investigation of Intermittency Measurement Methods for Transitional Boundary Layer Flows
Authors: Zhang, D.H.
Chew, Y.T.
Winoto, S.H. 
Keywords: Intermittency measurement
M-TERA
TERA
Transitional boundary layer flow
Ū method
Issue Date: May-1996
Source: Zhang, D.H., Chew, Y.T., Winoto, S.H. (1996-05). Investigation of Intermittency Measurement Methods for Transitional Boundary Layer Flows. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 12 (4) : 433-443. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(95)00133-6
Abstract: Three turbulent intermittency methods, namely the ū, TERA (turbulent energy recognition algorithm), and M-TERA (modified turbulent energy recognition algorithm) methods, for identifying the intermittent flow characteristics associated with boundary layer transition from laminar to turbulent were considered and compared. The data used were obtained from hot-wire measurements in transitional boundary layer flows on a concave surface with a 2-m radius of curvature and on a flat plate. Comparisons show that the ū and TERA methods are more sensitive to the choice of threshold constants than the M-TERA method. In terms of the intermittency distribution across the boundary layer, the values obtained by the ū and TERA methods are unrealistically high in the near-wall region, while those obtained by the M-TERA method are more realistic. In the outer boundary layer region and outside the boundary layer, the ū and M-TERA methods give reasonable intermittency values, whereas the TERA method produces unrealistically high values in the region outside the boundary layer. In addition, the M-TERA method provides a sharper definition of the end of transition.
Source Title: Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/58418
ISSN: 08941777
DOI: 10.1016/0894-1777(95)00133-6
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Dec 13, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Nov 16, 2017

Page view(s)

55
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.