Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2004.1299335
Title: Differentiated QoS for survivable WDM optical networks
Authors: Saradhi, C.V.
Gurusamy, M. 
Zhou, L.
Issue Date: May-2004
Source: Saradhi, C.V., Gurusamy, M., Zhou, L. (2004-05). Differentiated QoS for survivable WDM optical networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 42 (5) : S8-S14. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2004.1299335
Abstract: Optical networks based on WDM technology have become a promising solution to realize transport networks that can meet the ever-increasing demand for bandwidth. As WDM networks carry a huge volume of traffic, maintaining a high level of survivability is an important and critical issue. The development of GMPLS switching technology led to the direct integration of IP and WDM. In these IP-over-WDM networks different applications/end users need different levels of fault tolerance and differ in how much they are willing to pay for the service they get. The current trend in network development is moving toward a unified solution providing support for voice, data, and various multimedia services. Therefore, it is imperative that WDM networks incorporate fault tolerance into QoS requirements with various QoS parameters such as tolerance to single or multiple component failures, protection bandwidth, recovery time, and recovery granularity besides resource utilization and call acceptance ratio. This article presents a survey of various methods that have been proposed for providing service differentiation in survivable WDM networks and discuss their performance. Such methods are broadly classified under various paradigms such as differentiated reliability, R-connections, quality of protection, and quality of recovery.
Source Title: IEEE Communications Magazine
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/55635
ISSN: 01636804
DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2004.1299335
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

46
checked on Dec 7, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
checked on Nov 23, 2017

Page view(s)

24
checked on Dec 11, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.