Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparative study of aluminium-doped zinc oxide and ruthenium-aluminium co-doped zinc oxide by magnetron co-sputtering|
|Keywords:||Aluminium zinc oxide|
Transparent conducting oxide
|Source:||Wong, L.M., Wang, S.J., Chim, W.K. (2010-10-01). Comparative study of aluminium-doped zinc oxide and ruthenium-aluminium co-doped zinc oxide by magnetron co-sputtering. Thin Solid Films 518 (24 SUPPL.) : e93-e97. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.109|
|Abstract:||Highly oriented polycrystalline aluminium-doped (Al-doped) and ruthenium-aluminium (Ru-Al) co-doped zinc oxide are prepared on borosilicate glass and polycarbonate (PC) substrates by co-sputtering at room temperature. To investigate the effect of Ru doping, co-sputtering is achieved by varying the sputtering power of Ru target while keeping the sputtering target power of Al-doped zinc oxide unchanged. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) data shows that the root-mean-square roughness of all the films is less than ∼ 2.5 nm. With Ru doping, the resistivity of the film improves by one order of magnitude as compared to pure Al-doped zinc oxide sample. The resistivity and carrier concentration values obtained correlated to the degree of crystallinity in the samples. High optical transmittance in the visible range are achieved (> 90% for borosilicate glass and > 80% for PC). © 2010 Elsevier B.V.|
|Source Title:||Thin Solid Films|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jan 17, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Nov 18, 2017
checked on Jan 21, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.