Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2004.08.002
Title: Analysis and comparison of iterative learning control schemes
Authors: Xu, J.-X. 
Lee, T.H. 
Zhang, H.-W. 
Keywords: Experimental verification
Feedback
Feedforward
Iterative learning
Property comparison
Issue Date: Sep-2004
Source: Xu, J.-X., Lee, T.H., Zhang, H.-W. (2004-09). Analysis and comparison of iterative learning control schemes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17 (6) : 675-686. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2004.08.002
Abstract: Iterative learning control (ILC) schemes can be classified into the previous cycle learning (PCL), the current cycle learning (CCL) and the synergy - previous and current cycle learning (PCCL). In this work, we first present the configurations of various ILC schemes and the corresponding convergence conditions associated with each configuration. As a result of comparison, the PCCL scheme shows the ability of outperforming the PCL and CCL schemes owing to its underlying feature of two degrees of freedom design. Subsequently, we focus on two practical PCCL schemes with analysis and comparisons in frequency domain, substantiate the difference in the learning updating mechanisms, and in the sequel exploit the circumstances where one PCCL scheme can outperform the other. Based on system Bode plots, we can easily check the learning convergence condition, the complementary property of feedback and feedforward compensation, and which PCCL scheme can perform better. For the purpose of comparison and verification, both schemes are applied to a real-time ball-and-beam system. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source Title: Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/55057
ISSN: 09521976
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2004.08.002
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on Dec 7, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
checked on Nov 22, 2017

Page view(s)

16
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.