Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Analysis and comparison of iterative learning control schemes|
|Authors:||Xu, J.-X. |
|Source:||Xu, J.-X., Lee, T.H., Zhang, H.-W. (2004-09). Analysis and comparison of iterative learning control schemes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 17 (6) : 675-686. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2004.08.002|
|Abstract:||Iterative learning control (ILC) schemes can be classified into the previous cycle learning (PCL), the current cycle learning (CCL) and the synergy - previous and current cycle learning (PCCL). In this work, we first present the configurations of various ILC schemes and the corresponding convergence conditions associated with each configuration. As a result of comparison, the PCCL scheme shows the ability of outperforming the PCL and CCL schemes owing to its underlying feature of two degrees of freedom design. Subsequently, we focus on two practical PCCL schemes with analysis and comparisons in frequency domain, substantiate the difference in the learning updating mechanisms, and in the sequel exploit the circumstances where one PCCL scheme can outperform the other. Based on system Bode plots, we can easily check the learning convergence condition, the complementary property of feedback and feedforward compensation, and which PCCL scheme can perform better. For the purpose of comparison and verification, both schemes are applied to a real-time ball-and-beam system. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Dec 7, 2017
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Nov 22, 2017
checked on Dec 10, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.