Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A comparison of membranes and enrichment strategies for microbial fuel cells|
|Authors:||Lefebvre, O. |
Microbial fuel cell
|Source:||Lefebvre, O., Shen, Y., Tan, Z., Uzabiaga, A., Chang, I.S., Ng, H.Y. (2011-05). A comparison of membranes and enrichment strategies for microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology 102 (10) : 6291-6294. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.003|
|Abstract:||The external resistance is perhaps the easiest way to influence the operation of a microbial fuel cell (MFC). In this paper, three enrichment strategies, whereby the external resistance was fixed at: (1) a high value in order to maximize the cell voltage (U strategy); (2) a low value in order to maximize the current (I strategy); and (3) a value equal to the internal resistance of the MFC to maximize the power output (P strategy), were investigated. The I strategy resulted in increased maximum power generation and the likely reason is that electron transfer was facilitated under low external resistance, which in turn, favored the development of an electrochemically active biofilm. This experiment was conducted in a single-chamber MFC system equipped with a membrane electrode assembly, and a comparison of the performance achieved by five different membranes is also provided. Selemion was found to be a suitable alternative to Nafion. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.|
|Source Title:||Bioresource Technology|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 15, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jan 29, 2018
checked on Feb 19, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.