Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparing methods for performing trans-ethnic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies|
|Source:||Wang, X., Chua, H.-X., Chen, P., Ong, R.T., Sim, X., Zhang, W., Takeuchi, F., Liu, X., Khor, C.-C., Tay, W.-T., Cheng, C.-Y., Suo, C., Liu, J., Aung, T., Chia, K.-S., Kooner, J.S., Chambers, J.C., Wong, T.-Y., Tai, E.-S., Kato, N., Teo, Y.-Y. (2013-06). Comparing methods for performing trans-ethnic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Human Molecular Genetics 22 (11) : 2303-2311. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddt064|
|Abstract:||Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have discovered thousands of variants that are associated with human health and disease. Whilst early GWASs have primarily focused on genetically homogeneous populations of European, East Asian and South Asian ancestries, the next-generation genome-wide surveys are starting to pool studies from ethnically diverse populations within a single meta-analysis. However, classical epidemiological strategies for meta-analyses that assume fixed- or random-effects may not be the most suitable approaches to combine GWAS findings as these either confer low statistical power or identify mostly loci where the variants carry homogeneous effect sizes that are present in most of the studies. In a transethnic meta-analysis, it is likely that some genetic loci will exhibit heterogeneous effect sizes across the populations. This may be due to differences in study designs, differences arising from the interactions with other genetic variants, or genuine biological differences attributed to environmental, dietary or lifestyle factors that modulate the influence of the genes. Here we compare different strategies for meta-analyzing GWAS across genetically diverse populations, where we intentionally vary the effect sizes present across the different populations. We subsequently applied the methods that yielded the highest statistical power to a trans-ethnic meta-analysis of seven GWAS in type 2 diabetes, and showed that these methods identified bona fide associations that would otherwise have been missed by the classical strategies. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.|
|Source Title:||Human Molecular Genetics|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Mar 29, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jan 30, 2018
checked on Apr 21, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.