Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Priority setting at the macro level. Health care in relation to other fields of social policy|
|Keywords:||Basic health care|
|Source:||Schmidt, V.H. (2010). Priority setting at the macro level. Health care in relation to other fields of social policy. Ethik in der Medizin 22 (3) : 275-288. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-010-0075-y|
|Abstract:||Definition of the problem Public health care consumes a large and growing fraction of fiscal resources devoted to social security in socio-economically advanced countries without necessarily improving population health or social welfare in general. Arguments Using various performance indicators, the article assesses the efficacy of public health spending in light of its opportunity costs, i.e., the budget constraints it imposes on other fields of social policy, in a cross-country comparison. The study confirms the findings of earlier research, namely that public health care exceeding a basic level of provision for the entire population yields remarkably little benefit, and that countries spending more than others do not necessarily achieve better health outcomes. Indeed, countries allocating a greater share of public resources to education fare better in several dimensions of social welfare, including aggregate health. Conclusion Under conditions of fiscal austerity, a policy shift that places greater emphasis on public education should be seriously considered, if necessary, at the cost of public health. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.|
|Source Title:||Ethik in der Medizin|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Feb 14, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jan 17, 2018
checked on Feb 12, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.