Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.565170
Title: Critical Review of conceptual Definitions of Chinese Corruption: A formal-legal perspective
Authors: KO, K. 
Weng, C. 
Issue Date: Jun-2011
Source: KO, K.,Weng, C. (2011-06). Critical Review of conceptual Definitions of Chinese Corruption: A formal-legal perspective. Journal of Contemporary China 20 (70) : 359-378. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.565170
Abstract: This paper examines definitions of Chinese corruption. While many Chinese corruption studies have argued that Chinese corruption has its own unique features, our review of definitions of Chinese corruption featured in current academic literature reveals that most definitions in use are similar to the general definition of corruption: abuse of public office for private gains. Valuable as it is, such a general definition does not adequately specify the actors, behavior and motives in Chinese corruption. This paper argues that actors in Chinese corruption are not limited to employees in the public sector but also include any Chinese state functionary engaging in public activities. In addition, corrupt behavior refers to both economic (embezzlement, misappropriation of public funds, and bribery) and disciplinary corruption (violation of social norms and the dereliction of duty) that are damaging to public interests. In doing so, this paper finds that even behavior such as the dereliction of duty and violations of social norms, that is not motivated by private gain, is regarded as corruption in China. We also discuss the political nature of this broadly defined Chinese corruption. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.
Source Title: Journal of Contemporary China
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/52222
ISSN: 10670564
DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2011.565170
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

19
checked on Dec 12, 2017

Page view(s)

115
checked on Dec 7, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.