Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The genericity of beliefs-determine-preferences models revisited|
|Authors:||Chen, Y.-C. |
Full surplus extraction
|Citation:||Chen, Y.-C., Xiong, S. (2011-03). The genericity of beliefs-determine-preferences models revisited. Journal of Economic Theory 146 (2) : 751-761. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2010.12.005|
|Abstract:||Barelli [P. Barelli, On the genericity of full surplus extraction in mechanism design, J. Econ. Theory 144 (2009) 1320-1332] defines beliefs-determine-preferences (BDP) models and argues that BDP models are nongeneric in a topological sense. In this note, we point out some difficulties in Barelli's approach. Furthermore, we follow the idea of Heifetz and Neeman [A. Heifetz, Z. Neeman, On the generic (im)possibility of full surplus extraction, Econometrica 74 (2006) 213-233] to propose a more relevant notion of BDP* model. We prove that BDP* models are generic, which is opposite to Barelli's conclusion. © 2010 Elsevier Inc.|
|Source Title:||Journal of Economic Theory|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Aug 18, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Jul 25, 2018
checked on Jul 27, 2018
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.