Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is superior to the MiniMental State Examination in detecting patients at higher risk of dementia|
|Authors:||Dong, Y. |
mild cognitive impairment
|Source:||Dong, Y., Lee, W.Y., Basri, N.A., Collinson, S.L., Merchant, R.A., Venketasubramanian, N., Chen, C.L.-H. (2012-11). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment is superior to the MiniMental State Examination in detecting patients at higher risk of dementia. International Psychogeriatrics 24 (11) : 1749-1755. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610212001068|
|Abstract:||Background: To examine the discriminant validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in detecting patients with cognitive impairment at higher risk for dementia at a memory clinic setting. Methods: Memory clinic patients were administered the MoCA, MMSE, and a comprehensive formal neuropsychological battery. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes were dichotomized into two groups: single domainMCI (sdMCI) and multiple domain-MCI (mdMCI). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to compare the discriminatory ability of the MoCA and the MMSE. Results: Two hundred thirty patients were recruited, of which 136 (59.1%) were diagnosed with dementia, 61 (26.5%) with MCI, and 33 (14.3%) with no cognitive impairment (NCI). The majority of MCI patients had mdMCI (n=36, 59%). The MoCA had significantly larger AUCs than the MMSE in discriminating mdMCI from the lower risk group for incident dementia (NCI and sdMCI) [MoCA 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86 0.98) vs. MMSE 0.84 (95% CI, 0.750.92), p=0.02). At their optimal cut-off points, the MoCA (19/20) remained superior to the MMSE (23/24) in detecting mdMCI [sensitivity: 0.83 vs. 0.72; specificity: 0.86 vs. 0.83; PPV: 0.79 vs. 0.72; NPV: 0.89 vs. 0.83; correctly classified: 85.1% vs. 78.7%]. Conclusion: The MoCA is superior to the MMSE in the detection of patients with cognitive impairment at higher risk for incident dementia at a memory clinic setting. © International Psychogeriatric Association 2012.|
|Source Title:||International Psychogeriatrics|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Dec 13, 2017
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Nov 15, 2017
checked on Dec 9, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.