Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)00344-4
Title: Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: A comparison of water sorption characteristics
Authors: Yap, A.U.J. 
Keywords: Composite resins
Dental materials
Resin-modified glass ionomer cements
Water sorption
Issue Date: 1996
Source: Yap, A.U.J. (1996). Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: A comparison of water sorption characteristics. Biomaterials 17 (19) : 1897-1900. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)00344-4
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the amount of water absorbed by six commercially available resin-modified glass ionomer cements and to investigate the possible influence of time and resin content on water sorption. The materials evaluated included Variglass used as a restoration, base and liner; Fuji II LC; Fuji Liner; Vitrebond; Vitremer and Photac-Bond. Z100, a composite resin, was used as control. All specimens were manipulated according to manufacturers' instructions and then subjected to a water sorption test based on the ISO 4049 requirements. Storage in water was further extended to 1 month to evaluate the effects of time and indirectly cement maturity on water sorption. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Duncan's test at 0.05 significance level. Results show that the composite resin control had significantly less water sorption than all the resin-modified polyalkenoate cements evaluated. Variglass when used as a base or restorative had the least water sorption after both 1 week and 1 month storage in water. The degree of water sorption was product dependent and appeared to be influenced by the resin (HEMA) content. The results also reflect a potential relationship between time (cement maturity) and water sorption.
Source Title: Biomaterials
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46954
ISSN: 01429612
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(95)00344-4
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

35
checked on Dec 18, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

36
checked on Nov 21, 2017

Page view(s)

38
checked on Dec 17, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.