Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.006
Title: Effects of surface finish on indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives
Authors: Chung, S.M. 
Yap, A.U.J. 
Keywords: Dental composites
Dental restorative materials
Hardness
Indentation test
Mechanical properties
Modulus
Surface finish
Issue Date: 2005
Source: Chung, S.M., Yap, A.U.J. (2005). Effects of surface finish on indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives. Dental Materials 21 (11) : 1008-1016. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.006
Abstract: The depth-sensing micro-indentation testing was recently introduced for the characterization of dental composites. One of the critical issues raised was the possible influence of surface finish on material properties. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of surface finish on the indentation modulus and micro-hardness of resin-based dental composite materials. The materials used included minifill (Z100, 3M ESPE), microfill (A110, 3M ESPE) and poly-acid modified (F2000, 3M ESPE) composites. The specimens were polished successively using SiC grinding papers of different grit size and diamond suspensions to achieve varying surface roughness. The arithmetic mean of the roughness (Ra) was measured using profilometry. In the depth-sensing micro-indentation test, specimens (n=7) were indented to 10 N with Vickers indenter and the load-displacement (P-h) data was obtained using a universal testing system. The indentation modulus (Ein) and hardness (H) were then computed using the developed analytical solutions. Data was analyzed using ANOVA/post-hoc Scheffe's test at significance level 0.05. The polished specimens had surface roughness ranging from 0.02 to 0.81 μm. The roughness of F2000 was significantly higher than A110 and Z100. The Ein and H for Z100 ranged from 14.02 to 14.83 GPa and 1.18 to 1.27 GPa, respectively. E in for F2000 and A110 ranged from 12.25 to 13.82 GPa and 5.26 to 5.52 GPa and hardness ranged from 0.89 to 0.98 GPa and 0.52 to 0.55 GPa, respectively. The indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives were independent of the surface finish provided indenter penetration is sufficiently deep (hmax/Ra>30). © 2005 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source Title: Dental Materials
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46874
ISSN: 01095641
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.006
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Dec 6, 2017

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on Nov 21, 2017

Page view(s)

33
checked on Dec 10, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.