Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2341/11-419-L
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEffects of food-simulating liquids on surface properties of giomer restoratives
dc.contributor.authorKooi, T.J.M.
dc.contributor.authorTan, Q.Z.
dc.contributor.authorYap, A.U.J.
dc.contributor.authorGuo, W.
dc.contributor.authorTay, K.J.
dc.contributor.authorSoh, M.S.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T05:51:50Z
dc.date.available2013-10-16T05:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationKooi, T.J.M., Tan, Q.Z., Yap, A.U.J., Guo, W., Tay, K.J., Soh, M.S. (2012). Effects of food-simulating liquids on surface properties of giomer restoratives. Operative Dentistry 37 (6) : 665-671. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-419-L
dc.identifier.issn03617734
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46867
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the effects of food-simulating liquid (FSL) on the hardness and roughness of giomer restoratives based on prereacted glass ionomer (PRG) technology. The materials investigated included a regular (Beautifil II [BT]) and a recently introduced injectable (Beautifil Flow Plus F00 [BF]) hybrid PRG composite. A direct hybrid composite (Filtek Z250 [ZT]) and an indirect hybrid composite (Ceramage [CM]) were used for comparison. The materials were placed into customized square molds (5 mm × 5 mm × 2.5 mm), covered with Mylar strips, and cured according to manufacturers' instructions. The materials were then conditioned in air (control), distilled water, 50% ethanol solution, and 0.02 N citric acid at 37°C for seven days. Specimens (n=6) were then subjected to hardness testing (Knoop) and surface profilometry. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Scheffe test (p<0.05). Mean Knoop hardness values for the control group (air) ranged from 53.4 ± 3.4 (BF) to 89.5 ± 5.2 (ZT), while mean surface roughness values values ranged from 0.014 ± 0.002 (ZT) to 0.032 ± 0.001 (BT). All materials were significantly softened by FSL. The degree of softening by the different FSLs was material dependent. The hardness of giomers was most affected by citric acid and ethanol. The smoothest surface was generally observed with the control group. Giomer restoratives were significantly roughened by citric acid.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-419-L
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentRESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
dc.description.doi10.2341/11-419-L
dc.description.sourcetitleOperative Dentistry
dc.description.volume37
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page665-671
dc.identifier.isiut000311768500015
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.